- George GERSHWIN 1st part :
- La Symphonie du Nouveau Monde
- Rhapsody in blue : biography
- I got rhythm, I got music (1st part) : musicology
- Discography (1st part) : They can't take that away from me (classical)
- George Gershwin seen by : Leopold Godowsky III, Wynton Marsalis, Marcus Roberts
- Gershwin's books : bibliography
- Erroll GARNERr : Play Misty / Discography
- Marcus ROBERTS : Blues for the new millennium
- Photo album 98
George GERSHWIN / I got rhythm, I got music
Everyone knows the name of George Gershwin but hardly anyone knows what to make of it. Some would think of « The Man I Love » by Billie Holiday (1939) or « Lady, Be Good » by Ella Fitzgerald (1953), the Rhapsody in Blue by Paul Whiteman (1927) or by Michael Ray and Sun Ra (1980) or simply of the music featured in Woody Allen's Manhattan (1978). Whatever the connection we make with it the music is still here. Its depth lies in its pervasive tenderness and melodic evidence - it's the melody that suggests the chords, not the opposite. Gershwin' problem is that people liked him right from the off : classical and jazz critics alike felt that they ought to disagree or put forward reservations. He belonged to his time, his fans will say. He was only a fashionable musicians, opponents will counter. If one wants to understand his music rather than praise or indict it, one has to make allowances for the 'plural' context of music in New York (Manhattan and Harlem) at the beginning of the 20th century. That music was a music of the people in its essence. The music by Dvoràk, Gershwin or Ravel was learned but based on folk music and it aimed at talking to people. Whereas since 1947 the pseudo revolutionary ideology of culture advertised by the dodecaphonists and their followers (André Hodeir) has invaded music : true high-brow art should be severed from any folk roots.
Nowadays, the main stream is that so-called 'plural' or 'contemporary' wave (they sometimes call themselves 'jazz'). Its 'plurality' could have been as open as its beginning of the century counterpart ; it would have produced a new Gershwin, a new Duke Ellington
But contrary to the current trend Gershwin or Ellington were not narrow-minded or racist, they didn't live off public funds and they loved their audience.
Much like Louis Armstrong and his hit « What a Wonderful World », Gershwin got a posthumous hit with « Our Love is Here to Stay ». A piano virtuoso, he remains above all known as a composer with great melodic skill. It must be borne in mind that Gershwin preceded Ellington as far as composing pieces of some magnitude is concerned. As Black philosopher Alain Locke points out in his historical book The Negro and his Music (1936, Kennikat Press), in the period from 1915 to 1924 Black American music was working out and getting organized. The same structuring elements, mostly derived from spirituals, were leading to different sorts of music equally labelled 'jazz'. 'Jazz' was then a purely fashionable word. (One might argue with reason that the history of the word has come full circle given its extensive use to sell any 'jazzy' item). The word came to prominence before Schaefner, Pannassié, Hammond, Delaunay or Simmen used it to refer to 'Hot Music' which was only one of the genres depicted by the term. Hot Music itself was not so well-known at the time of the Gershwin. From 1926 and even more so since 1929 the New York forms (rag, stride, symphony) fusioned with the New Orleans and Chicago styles (more specifically hot) : jazz was born. It was born out of very specific conditions that only happen once. It all happenned after Gershwin had matured into a significant and successful composer. All the same, Gershwin's musicianship was to provide that revolutionary music with songs whose melodic and rhythmical elements were perfect foils for hot and swinging expression. Gershwin himself might not have used the term 'swing' and would probalby have talked of 'rhythm' : he never thought of himself as a jazzman (contrary to some contemporary musicians) but was never alien to the jazz planet, even from a purely pianistic point of view (cf « Sweet and Low Down » or « That Certain Feeling », London 1926).
Marcus ROBERTS / Blues for the new millenium
Marthaniel Marcus Roberts was born on August 7th 1963 in Jacksonville. The musical culture of his family is deeply marked by gospel. When he won the 1987 Thelonious Monk Institute competition it looked like an apposite nod to Monk who embodies for Roberts the ultimate level of accomplishment in art. Marcus Roberts is rarely to be heard at all in concerts and especially in Europe, so we had to go and annoy him in his hometown, where he lives with his family, rehearses, composes arranges his music. Jacksonville is not a typical Florida town although it sits next to the ocean. With about 300 000 citizens, it is rather unexceptional and a long way from the usual route of tourists or jazz life. Marcus Roberts has chosen to stay away from New York, the music business and the media - he judges the value of his work by the time he spends toiling at it, not by the mention of his name in papers. He thinks of himself as a jazz musician but, like Wynton Marsalis (who contributed to launching and directing his career), he has a double musical life and gladly confronts the classical repertoire at the fringe of jazz - Gershwin for instance.
He was a mite surprised that a French magazine should travel such a long way to talk about jazz and welcomed us in the house of his brother, S. Eugene Roberts who assists him with his business. We sat in a modest living-room with pictures of important family events and talked about the guiding forces of his career. Not a very talkative character when asked about his personal life or his family environement, he quickly becomes impassioned as soon as music is the topic.
Erroll GARNER / Play Misty
« Hooch, man, You're a genius ». Jimmie Smith (dm)
Like Louis Armstrong or Thelonious Monk, Erroll Garner stands as one of the rare breed of musicians immediately identifiable by the most casual listener. Most like all geniuses, "Hoochie-Coochie-Coo" sounds like a born classic who carved his musical language with a deeply original and natural piano style. With the magical touch of poets and conjurers, he makes the old sound new and the odd sound familiar, giving change its aura of permanence and making fleeting moments eternal. The extraordinary originality of his playing could be descibed as revolutionary but revolution was indeed for him a way to pay homage to tradition.
It is thus natural that Time has in no way altered the power of his music and that we should still be deeply affected by its balance, its blossoming sensitivity, gusto, openness and lambent lyricism. Power and nuance dovetail into rhythmic and harmonic figures of bold complexity that work out with self-evident simplicity. Who wouldn't acknowledge Milt Jackson's apt description of Garner as "fun master" ?
|
|
|